Dave Bogg's wrote a recent article in his The Boggs e-Learning Chronicle blog In this article , "Opportunity Cost Associated With Most Job Appraisals" he's put forward the idea proposed by James Adonis who wrote a recent article that bashes 6 month or 12 month
standard performance review handed out by most HR departments in his
article, "Appraisals Lack One Thing: Performance".
Adonis advocates continuous feedback recommending short, monthly
reviews, and other techniques as an alternative to the 6 month or 12
month standard performance review.
While that idea seems innocent enough, it unfortunately, is hardly that simple.
You see, we must talk about performance feedback systems in the context of the "generation" that you're dealing with. As you know, we have four very distinct generations in todays workforce, and each have far different life experiences, perspectives, work habits and values. They also have far different expectations regarding how and what type of feedback they seek.
Here's some basics about Feedback in todays more complex workforce.
If you are in Management or HR you must also recognize and change the way you communicate expectations and provide feedback across generations. For example, for a traditionalist: “no news is good news.” is acceptable feedback. A baby-boomer generation worker expects feedback once a year and lots of documentation. X'ers may drop by and say “sorry to interrupt but how am i doing?”, while Millenials are thinking “I expect performance feedback whenever I want it at the push of a button.”
To add to this, you may also experience cultural variations on feedback expectations. We'll save that for a future post.
Sheds a slightly different light on things, does it not?
Recent Comments